01
SENSE
Collect signals, process data, context, operator observations, and missing-information cues.
Manish Sharma Lab
I build AI, monitoring, and decision-support systems for industrial processes, grounded in public work in Laser Metal Deposition and Directed Energy Deposition at Exafuse.
The work connects process signals, models, engineering context, decisions, and physical verification.
Name
Manish Sharma
Category
Industrial AI & Decision Systems
Established proof
AI for LMD / DED at Exafuse
Method
Sense -> Model -> Decide -> Verify
Boundary
Decision support connected to engineering evidence
Operating method
The site uses one public operating loop: connect observed signals to model assumptions, decisions, and the evidence needed to verify outcomes.
01
Collect signals, process data, context, operator observations, and missing-information cues.
02
Combine machine learning, engineering rules, uncertainty, constraints, and traceable assumptions.
03
Structure recommendations, trade-offs, risk priorities, next actions, and human-review boundaries.
04
Connect decisions to inspection, measured outcomes, feedback loops, and physical evidence.
Established public proof
My deepest public work is in LMD/DED process monitoring, robotic workflows, industrial repair, RFQ structure, and inspection-aware decision support at Exafuse.
CS15
This is the strongest public anchor for my interest in AI-assisted process understanding without replacing inspection evidence.
CS01
This maps directly to the LMD Repairability Index and the Quality Evidence Ladder.
CS10
This is a clean RFQ-intelligence example: damage boundary, lead time, machining route and inspection context decide the recommendation.
CS13
This supports the site's build-and-coat logic: geometry and surface function should be evaluated as one workflow.
Flagship resources
These public assets make the verification thesis practical inside the established LMD/DED proof domain.
More public assets
The LMD/DED authority layer remains intact and easy to reach from the broader identity.
Interactive
Check whether an LMD workflow has the data foundations needed for useful AI-assisted monitoring.
Working framework
Map failure modes, process signals, AI visibility, and validation evidence in one vocabulary.
Working framework
Define maturity stages for LMD data capture, analytics, decision support, and closed-loop development.
Source map
Curated starting map for LMD, DED, process monitoring, AI, repair, quality, and terminology sources.
Workbench
Frontend-only tools for LMD vs SLM, repairability, and RFQ structuring.
Definitions
Definitions for LMD, DED, laser cladding, and melt-pool monitoring.
Applied writing
2026-05-09
Clear terminology keeps LMD, DED, laser cladding, SLM, LPBF, monitoring, and certification claims from being mixed together.
2026-05-09
A checklist of questions that exposes overconfident AI repair recommendations before they reach an engineering workflow.
2026-05-09
LMD repair decisions should include machining allowance, tolerance recovery, inspection access, and acceptance criteria from the start.